Jump to content
WheelhorseBob

C-161 front axle mods.

Recommended Posts

WheelhorseBob

Ok guys, 

 

I recently picked up a NOS D-series front axle assembly. I consists of the axle, 1” spindles and rims with bearings. If I were to put a 520 swept front axle in my 161, I could use the spindles and rims to make the heaviest C series front evah! Thoughts and has anyone done this? If this sounds foolish say so. I’m sure a D-series enthusiast would covet this front end.

Edited by WheelhorseBob
  • Excellent 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
oliver2-44

@WheelhorseBob it almost been half an hour, have you got it finished yet. :ychain:

Edited by oliver2-44
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
WheelhorseBob

Not yet my friend. But I’ll get on it!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
pfrederi

There may be an alignment issue for the tie rods.  The D series spindles have a bent tie rod attachment plate, 520s are straight.

 

 

IMG_0058 (2).JPG

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
WheelhorseBob
4 hours ago, pfrederi said:

There may be an alignment issue for the tie rods.  The D series spindles have a bent tie rod attachment plate, 520s are straight.

 

 

IMG_0058 (2).JPG

I had considered that. I would make custom length tie rods anyhow.  And the tie rod plate on the C161 Is shorter because the stock 3/4" spindles have the upswept tie rod mounts already. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
c-series don

I think you might be better off just getting a 520 forward swept front axle. I believe it would be a heck of a lot less work and you will have a front end that is capable of whatever you want to do, loader, blower, 60” deck etc. Just my two cents!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
WheelhorseBob

Based on comparing my C161 and 520 it looks to me like the D series spindles with a slightly longer set of tie rods would work perfectly with a 520 swept axle. The geometry seems close. IDK, I really don’t need a heavier front on the 161 for my use. Just thinking of a way to use the NOS parts I have.... 

image.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...