Jump to content
fuzzystump

416-H vs. 417-A: Which is the better buy?

Recommended Posts

fuzzystump

Looking for some advice:

I currently own a 418-A, which I am going to take out of service to do some restoring.
In the meantime, I need to pick up a machine for my regular mowing/snow blowing chores.
There are 2 machines for sale locally that I'm interested in, but not sure which is the better choice:
417-A with 1,065 hours asking $1,300 or best offer, the other is a 416-H with 400 hours $750
Both come with mowing decks (not a factor as I currently have 2 decks)
The 417 has the Kohler Command 18.
416 is powered by the Onan.

I don't know the year of each, but the obvious answer is that 416 is a lot newer - since it was only made in the 90's and the 417 was only produced in 85-86.
I'm leaning towards the 417, even though it's older and has more hours, but I could really use some insight from the members here, as you are much more knowledgeable with respect to the pro's and cons of each.  I don't know much about the Onana engine, but I know the Kohlers have a great reputation.


Any advice/input/knowledge/guidance is greatly appreciated as I'd like to make a decision and pull the trigger before they're... and, as we all know, they tend to sell quick!

Thanks in advance,
Brian

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
kpinnc

The P216 and P218 Onan engines aren't as fickle as the P220 (20hp), but I'm not a fan of Onan either way. Of course if correct 400 hours is nothing. 

 

That being said, 1300 hours on a Kohler twin is getting up there. If it has been meticulously maintained, I would lean that way as well. But seeing would make all the difference for me. 

 

Both being hydros... you're just gonna have to look them over. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Tonytoro416

I currently have 3 Onan engines. I was like you and very Leary of them when I bought my 416h.  All 3 of my current Onans I’m sure have over 1,000 hours on them. My 416h is my go to tractor. It always starts doesn’t matter how long it’s sat or how cold it is.  I don’t have a picture of the 3rd tractor and engine but it’s a 520. All have been excellent tractors 

IMG_0158.jpeg

IMG_0078.jpeg

IMG_0664.jpeg

IMG_0524.jpeg

IMG_1078.jpeg

  • Like 2
  • Excellent 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Bill D

I too was leary of Onans,  but now I  have two 416H's and a 416-8.   Personally I would go with the 416H.  All of the problems you read about are relatively easy to fix.  With some minor wiring modifications you can prevent burnup issues with the notorious  9 pin connector. 400 hours is nothing.  Buy it and run it, you won't be disappointed.

Edited by Bill D
  • Excellent 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
953 nut
9 hours ago, fuzzystump said:

The 417 has the Kohler Command 18.

The Kohler Command is a much newer engine so the hour meter reading is probably inconsequential. Wheel Horse began using the Command engines in the very late 1990s and continued to use them up to the end of production. They have a fairly good reputation and the newer replacement engine may be the seller's justification for the higher asking price.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
pfrederi

Better check the Spec Number of the Command Pro 18.  They did not have ball bearing crank shafts. More like KT and Magnums only some came with a thrust crank shaft. (had some sort of radial thrust bearing),. most has a "non-Thrust crankshaft.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
953 nut
40 minutes ago, pfrederi said:

Better check the Spec Number of the Command Pro 18.  They did not have ball bearing crank shafts. More like KT and Magnums only some came with a thrust crank shaft. (had some sort of radial thrust bearing),. most has a "non-Thrust crankshaft.

The newer  Wheel Horses with the two cylinder Kohler Command engine all had electric clutches tied in with the No-Mow in Reverse switching. To my knowledge none would have had the thrust bearings in the engine.

Edited by 953 nut
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
kpinnc
1 hour ago, pfrederi said:

They did not have ball bearing crank shafts.

 

Neither do any Onans. Not on P216, 218, or 220. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
fuzzystump

Thank you all for the input. “953 nut” makes a good point: the Kohler Command 18 is a replacement motor so the 1,061 hours on the meter is probably inaccurate (for the motor, anyway).
I’ll just have to look at both and go from there, but it sounds like either one would be a good choice, which is comforting to know.

  • Excellent 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Bill D
2 minutes ago, fuzzystump said:

Thank you all for the input. “953 nut” makes a good point: the Kohler Command 18 is a replacement motor so the 1,061 hours on the meter is probably inaccurate (for the motor, anyway).
I’ll just have to look at both and go from there, but it sounds like either one would be a good choice, which is comforting to know.

I'd go with the 416H if only for the reason that it likely hasn't been modified incorrectly by the previous owner(s).  If the engine swap wasn't done correctly,  you could be in for a world of problems.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
pfrederi

Does the 417 have an electric PTO now???  If he ran an regular PTO on the Command I would avoid it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...