Jump to content
Bull

WH 417A versus 520H

Recommended Posts

Bull

Hello,

 

Are there any huge differences between the models 417A and 520H with their overall condition being equal? Besides the engines is one better on hilly terrain? Is one a little more nimble? 

 

Thanks,

Bull

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Pollack Pete

I have one of each.No camparison between the two.I like the power of the 520H.I like the 417's less electrical issues.Each has many good points.Very few  bad points.After all.....they ARE Wheel Horses.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
johnnymag3

Love the 417 and the 418.....would NEVER trade mine for a 520....

My 2 cents.....

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
johnnymag3

Especially the HYDRO !!!!  Versions

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
pfrederi

The 417A will have a Series 2 KT17. The lubrication issues in the series one were fixed so operating on normal grades is not an issue.  If you like to solve electrical issues go for the 520 :P other wise i would pick the 417A.

  • Like 2
  • Excellent 1
  • Heart 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Pollack Pete
33 minutes ago, pfrederi said:

   If you like to solve electrical issues go for the 520 :P other wise i would pick the 417A.

Amen to that! I've worked on so many 520H's that I've pulled out what little hair I have left.Work on them......use them.......work on them.......use them.Vicious cycle.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
bds1984

My vote is for the 417.  I recently acquired a C175 with a Series II and love its throaty sound so I may be a bit biased.  I also have a straight axle 520H, but it has been repowered with an M18 (the Onan had the valve seat issue) so there really is no difference between those two now other than the much more complex wiring harness which I ended up replacing.  

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
johnnymag3

Kohler shakes it........

Onan fakes it.....

 

Just my .02

 

:unsure:

  • Like 2
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
tom2p

416 and 417 might be better comparison - than 520 and 417

 

520 engine significantly larger and more power 

 

 

KT17 - 691cc

 

P216 - 710cc

 

P220 - 782cc

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
tom2p
4 hours ago, Bull said:

Hello,

 

Are there any huge differences between the models 417A and 520H with their overall condition being equal? Besides the engines is one better on hilly terrain? Is one a little more nimble? 

 

Thanks,

Bull


if the 520 - or any Onan powered tractor - sat outside or in a wet / damp area ...   fuhgetaboutit 

 

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
wh500special
2 hours ago, johnnymag3 said:

Kohler shakes it........

Onan fakes it.....

 

Just my .02

 

:unsure:

 

You got that right, those Onans are so smooth they just don't shake anything.

 

That comment not withstanding, I think the 417 is a more user friendly machine.  The 500's - at their present age - tend to be much more problematic.

 

Steve

Edited by wh500special
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
pfrederi

I will agree that the Onans are more powerful but unless you are running a 2 stage blower in heavy snow or using a 60in deck in heavy grass i doubt you would ever find the 417 lacking in power you might have to go a tad slower in those two instances.  The  Onan parts are a bit harder to find and more pricey but my real issue is eh electrical systge.  just look at the electrical section here...520s are significantly over represented....

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
tom2p
1 hour ago, pfrederi said:

I will agree that the Onans are more powerful but unless you are running a 2 stage blower in heavy snow or using a 60in deck in heavy grass i doubt you would ever find the 417 lacking in power you might have to go a tad slower in those two instances.  The  Onan parts are a bit harder to find and more pricey but my real issue is eh electrical systge.  just look at the electrical section here...520s are significantly over represented....

 

agree on the performance - but will the parts availability and price differences be significant ... ? ... Onan twin vs Kohler twin ?


when I first thought about an upgrade from my 312 - 416 and 417 were at the top of my list 

 

but very few 417's available at the time - and fortunately did not find one because at the time I was unaware of the KT17 series 1 issues and my luck I would have gotten one 
 

I ran into a Farmall / Wheelhorse guy that raved about 416-H (and Onan engines) - and I found one 

 

1000 hours later and not one issue ; it has been as reliable as my 312-8 ... 

 

even if it explodes the next time I use it - it is probably the best vehicle I've owned - ever - of any type ...  and that includes around 25 cars / trucks and 10 motorcycles 

 

the 312 might be the second best  lol

 

Edited by tom2p
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
tom2p


also got to throw out some love for the Eaton 1100 hydro trans 

 

my use is proof they are durable and will take a beating 


no issues - and did not change fluid as frequently as I should have - sometimes years / many hours - possibly 200+ hours  ... and years of use with grass clippings/mulch packed under the tunnel on the hydro unit

 

at the time did not know better - I did inspect the fan and surrounding area to ensure fan was operating and free of debris - but never inspected the area under the tunnel (cringe)

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Ed Kennell

No real problems with either of mine.        The 520 sounds and feels like a larger tractor,  but the KT17 sounds good and is a grunt.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Bull

To All,

 

Thanks so much for your input. I will let you know if I am still in the running for the 417A.

 

Thanks,

Bull

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
c-series don

I have a 417-A with a two stage snowblower and let me tell you, that thing kicks butt. It really is amazing how much snow it will move. I love the sound of that series two under a load! 

D8671923-15A7-4C60-A391-36C3CA8ADC9D.jpeg

  • Like 4
  • Excellent 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
johnnymag3
18 hours ago, wh500special said:

 

You got that right, those Onans are so smooth they just don't shake anything.

 

 

 

 

Steve....you nailed it !!!   Its hard to shake anything when it wont start or run.....Too much of a headache those Onans are....and don't get them damp or wet....EEEEK!!!!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
lynnmor
45 minutes ago, johnnymag3 said:

Steve....you nailed it !!!   Its hard to shake anything when it wont start or run.....Too much of a headache those Onans are....and don't get them damp or wet....EEEEK!!!!

 

I know what you mean, I had an ignition module go bad in one of my four Onans.  With only 5,000 hours of total usage, I guess that is totally unacceptable.

  • Like 1
  • Excellent 2
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
johnnymag3

Lynnmor.......you know your example is a rare one:happy-bouncymagenta:

              ......People complain about those Problematic Onans constantly here on the Forum. Its a known fact..:techie-reference:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
lynnmor
1 hour ago, johnnymag3 said:

Lynnmor.......you know your example is a rare one:happy-bouncymagenta:

              ......People complain about those Problematic Onans constantly here on the Forum. Its a known fact..:techie-reference:

Most of what I see is self-inflicted.  Many of the issues are external to the engine, the constant complaints of electrical problems are an example.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
wh500special

Onan made fantastic engines, but they just didn't work well in the 500 series tractor.  If you look at stationary (generator) engines the same Performer series would last for 5000+ hours, but whatever is magic about the Wheel Horse application of them causes problems.  JD had great success with them in their garden tractors.  Others probably did too.

 

WH went with the Onan in the 520 because it put out more power and torque than the other options at the time which was beneficial for the 60" mower and the big two stage snowblower.  Hindsight shows us that they liked to ingest a lot of chaff off the left side of the mower deck, that the rear blower tins are next to impossible to remove for cleaning the back cylinder or adjusting the valve lash without removing the engine, and that the computer grade Molex connector carrying high currents right by the outgassing battery was a waterfall of compounding issues.  Keep 'em clean, let 'em breathe, and  they last a long time.

 

Steve

 

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Goofey

417A would be my pick all day long for a number of reasons. 

  • Like 1
  • Heart 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Goofey
17 hours ago, c-series don said:

I love the sound of that series two under a load! 

 

Exactly. Its the best sound ever. I love it.

  • Like 1
  • Heart 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
johnnymag3

Same with the Kohler M18 Twin...what a beast of an engine !! The sound cannot be replicated, Wicked smooth and reliable...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...