Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
CasualObserver

Is there an SR-64 on this tractor?

Recommended Posts

CasualObserver

Unless I'm mistaken... it looks like there's an SR-64 kit on this tractor!

124c_1.JPG

It's on ebay.gif right now... i think we've commented on the tractor itself before either from EB or CL... I just noticed it when he said the belt guards are missing... and the drive pulley looked oversized and the belt pattern looked off. What ya'll think?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Curmudgeon

Maybe, but something, not sure what, (besides the missing guards) doesn't look right to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Nick

If you zoom in they put a flat idler pulley in front of the belt tightner puller and one in front of the transmission pulley at the bottom. They might have just added a larger pulley on the transmission not a real SR-64 kit. :whistle:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
TT

That's exactly the way the SR-64 speed reduction is:

sr64.jpg

I'd say that's what it is..... too bad the belt guard is missing. :whistle:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Rollerman

Good eye's Jason...have that one on my watch list.

It was on Craigslist for some time at around $500 or so.

Somewhere under the ugly customization there is a nice 702 in there wanting to be saved.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Nick

I have seen wild Bill talk about the SR-64 for many years but I didnt remember anything about the extra flat idlers. :whistle:

Why does the larger rear pulley require the extra idlers?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Curmudgeon

Well by golly gee! I stand corrected, or rather, sit so.

I was thinking a second belt/pulley arrangement, as always, I made it more complicated than it need to be.

So it's just a larger rear pulley, guard, and a couple of flat idlers to maintain proper clearance for routing issues or whatever.

Wheel Horse simplicity and functionality at it's best, as always. Cool beans.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
TT

I'm guessing (and I stress - guessing :whistle: ) that the bottom idler is to hold the belt up so an even "deeper" guard wasn't needed. I'd say the top one is there to keep the tensioner idler geometry correct. (so it would still declutch properly)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Nick

Either way I learned something new today. Now if I remember that bit of information when looking at tractors Im all set to find one. :whistle:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
BPjunk

The 1964 Speed Reduction kit (SR-64) used a 7-1/2 inch in diameter drive pulley at the transmission and two flat groove pulleys along with a L O N G 76 inch drive belt. The flat groove pulleys are actully the same pulley used on the drive belt of the RJ-58, since the belt was so long it was figgured two idlers would be needed and also the diameter of the 7-1/2 inch pulley will need to have the belt contact a lareg area of the pulley groove so the belt will not slip because of the added torque multiplycation. :WRS:

There is two versions of the SR-64 :whistle: but the only difference is the additional mounting holes that are in the drive belt guard for later model Wheel Horses. You can tell a SR-64 drive belt guard by the lower end as it is bent down ward to except the larger diameter pulley.

Bill in Richmond, Va.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...