Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Dale

what better cradle mount or soild mount

Recommended Posts

Dale

I have a C-81 I want to repower with K-301 I have both soild and rubber mounted which do you pefer? and is the a difference in vabiration

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Kelly

Me I like the solid mount engines, the Iso mount engines tend to shake more, and make the tractor rattle, and that is one with good rubber mounts, I have another that the rubbers are shot in and that one shakes wicked at a idle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Docwheelhorse

The rubber mount engines tend to pull backwards against the mounts when you engage the PTO--the whole engine tilts slightly.... then they where suppose to stop vibration (NOT..) and then they reduce the capacity of your oil pan by half..... I vote and run solid mount engines wherever I can

Tony

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
300zx

Dale, my vote is solid mounts for the same reasons as Kelly and Doc said. I think Wheel Horse came to the same conclusion after putting them on the C series, because they went back to solid mounts in the 80's and 90's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
rmaynard

My vote is for solid.

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Retired Wrencher

:) :USA::wh: I will jump in on the band wagon and say Solid my C-141 does not run like the rest of the heard. + @ $20.00 a piece and less power loss. Easy decision. Gary B...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...